USPTO serial 76110546
CIRCULON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIRCULON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electrical appliances for commercial use and for domestic use, namely food blenders, hand-held blenders, hand mixers, stand mixers, coffee grinders, food processors, juice extractors, citrus juicers, food choppers and slicers, knives, can openers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electric irons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CIRCULON
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |