USPTO serial 76111342
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
411 39 Goteborg, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara H. Loewenthal
BARBARA H LOEWENTHAL GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVE 8TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NAUTICAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, CINEMATOGRAPHIC, OPTICAL, LAND SURVEYING, INSPECTION, WEIGHTING, MEASURING, SIGNALING, LIFE-SAVING AND TEACHING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS NAMELY, PHOTOGRAPHIC CAMERAS, VIDEO CAMERAS, MOTION PICTURE CAMERAS, OPTICAL DISCS AND FILTERS, AUDIO CAN VIDEO TAPE PLAYERS; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION AND REPRODUCTION OF SOUND AND IMAGES, NAMELY, AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS; BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS; PHONOGRAPH RECORDS VENDING MACHINES AND MECHANISMS FOR COIN OPERATED APPARATUS; CASH REGISTERS, CALCULATORS, DATA PROCESSORS AND COMPUTERS; FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AND ELECTRIC BEAM GUNS CONSISTING OF SELF-DEVELOPED UNITS PRODUCING, FOCUSING AND CONTROLLING THE ELECTRONS IN APPLICANT'S PROCESS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |