Drawing for SMART LUNCH

USPTO serial 76111750

SMART LUNCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART LUNCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick C. Stephenson

PATRICK C STEPHENSONMCGRATH N MULLIN & KRATZ1601 DODGE ST STE 3700 FIRST NATL TWROMAHA, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Lunch entrees consisting primarily of soy-based meat substitutesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 11, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 7, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 2, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 19, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 5, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 3, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Jan 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jul 8, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance