USPTO serial 76113098
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanna L. Sacavitch
JOANNA L SACAVITCH GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLPP O BOX 77630SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107-0630UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers and computer hardware; personal digital assistants; telephones; wireless communication equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | assembling marketing data for others; dissemination of advertising for others via a global communication network; on-line services, namely, retail store services featuring computer hardware and computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | on-line services, namely, providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | on-line services, namely the distribution of computer hardware and software and provision of global computer network access; providing a wide variety of information about products and services via a global computer network; advertising the goods and services of others; providing multiple user access to information, products and services of others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |