USPTO serial 76113173
LEARNINGTRAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEARNINGTRAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evelyn A. Ashley
FRANK S BENJAMIN MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP303 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5300ATLANTA, GA 30308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE; EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE FOR DEVELOPING AND DELIVERING OF CURRICULUM BASED TESTING MATERIALS LOCALLY AND VIA AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE FOR DEVELOPING AND DELIVERING OF CURRICULAR CONTENT, NAMELY, PRIMARY SCHOOL LEVEL CURRICULUM, BASED UPON LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND STUDENT PERFORMANCE METRICS LOCALLY AND VIA AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| May 22, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |