USPTO serial 76113303
I-MASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2989884Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2005
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I-MASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Petach Tikva, IL
Petach Tikva, IL
JACKSONVILLE TECHNOLOGY ASSSOCIATES, INC.
West Jacksonville, FL
Other trademarks owned by JACKSONVILLE TECHNOLOGY ASSSOCIATES, INC.
JACKSONVILLE TECHNOLOGY ASSSOCIATES, INC.
West Jacksonville, FL
Other trademarks owned by JACKSONVILLE TECHNOLOGY ASSSOCIATES, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John R. Harris
JOHN R HARRIS MORRIS, MANNING & MARTIN LLP1600 ATLANTA FINANCIAL CTR3343 PEACHTREE RD NEATLANTA, GA 30326-1044Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING, MONITORING, ANALYZING, REPORTING AND BILLING TELEPHONY SERVICES PROVIDED OVER PACKET NETWORKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECI Telecom Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by ECI Telecom Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by JACKSONVILLE TECHNOLOGY ASSSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JACKSONVILLE TECHNOLOGY ASSSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named I-MASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |