USPTO serial 76116119
VILLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GHARIB, GOLNAZ
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VILLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE J LOTT
LESLIE J LOTT P O DRAWER 141098LOTT & FRIEDLAND PACORAL GABLES, FL 33114-1098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | OUTDOOR PATIO FURNITURE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2004 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |