USPTO serial 76116165
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Parker H. Bagley
PARKER H BAGLEY MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLP1 CHASE MANHATTAN PLZNEW YORK, NY 10005-1413UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA BASE SOFTWARE FOR MANAGEMENT OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH MEMBERS, DONORS, ACTIVITIES AND VOLUNTEERS FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING IN THE FORM OF GENERAL TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, NAMELY PROVIDING TRAINING TO VOLUNTEERS IN NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF DATABASE SOFTWARE AND IN ON-LINE COORDINATION OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MEMBERS OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND DONORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer technology and consulting services for non-profit organizations, namely, computer hardware and software consultation services; computer software development; computer programming for others; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; computer software design for others; consultation in the field of technical management of web sites and Internet services, namely creating, maintaining, updating and monitoring the web sites for others; designing and implementing web sites for others; editing technical research and development of Internet web site contents, namely adapting and recasting information in an HTML format; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer projects management services for non-profit organizations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |