Drawing for TECHROCKS

USPTO serial 76116165

TECHROCKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHROCKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Parker H. Bagley

PARKER H BAGLEY MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLP1 CHASE MANHATTAN PLZNEW YORK, NY 10005-1413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DATA BASE SOFTWARE FOR MANAGEMENT OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH MEMBERS, DONORS, ACTIVITIES AND VOLUNTEERS FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONSACTIVE
041TRAINING IN THE FORM OF GENERAL TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, NAMELY PROVIDING TRAINING TO VOLUNTEERS IN NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF DATABASE SOFTWARE AND IN ON-LINE COORDINATION OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MEMBERS OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND DONORSACTIVE
042Computer technology and consulting services for non-profit organizations, namely, computer hardware and software consultation services; computer software development; computer programming for others; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; computer software design for others; consultation in the field of technical management of web sites and Internet services, namely creating, maintaining, updating and monitoring the web sites for others; designing and implementing web sites for others; editing technical research and development of Internet web site contents, namely adapting and recasting information in an HTML format; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer projects management services for non-profit organizationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 19, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 19, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 16, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 16, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 19, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 19, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 17, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 17, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 31, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance