USPTO serial 76117174
THE HORSE CLOSET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 16, 2006
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE HORSE CLOSET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Williamsport, PA
Williamsport, PA
Williamsport, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford A. Rieders
CLIFFORD A RIEDERS RIEDERS, TRAVIS HUMPHREY ET AL161 W THIRD STP O BOX 215WILLIAMSPORT, PA 17703-0215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Horse apparel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 10, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |