USPTO serial 76119939
R&M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with R&M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cory M. Amron, Esq.
CORY M AMRON ESQ VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP1828 L ST NW FL W 11WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mining machines and tools, namely, cutter loaders, coal cutters, rock drills, sharpeners, drilling and boring machines, earth loaders, truck mills and Hobels; construction machines and tools-- power operated excavators, namely, power shovels, rooters, and dozershovels; foundation machines, namely, earth augers, pile drivers, pile extractors, grouting pumps; earth finishing machines, namely, graders, scrapers, tampers, bulldozers, rammers and rollers; concrete machines, namely, concrete placing machines, concrete vibrators, concrete paving machines, concrete mixers and batching plants; asphalt paving machines, namely, asphalt distributors, asphalt finishers, asphalt plants and asphalt mixers; dredging machines, namely, dippers; powered jacks, namely, unloading hoppers, automatic warehouse; parts and accessories thereof; undercarriage, namely, link assay, track rollers, sprockets, track shoes; filter elements, namely, engine oil elements, file elements, air elements, hydraulic elements; ground engaging tools, namely, bucket teeth, adaptors and cutting edges; waste compressing and crushing apparatus, namely, construction waste recycle system, waste pet bottle recycling plant, plastic waste recycle system, chipper shredders and hammer crushers | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, cellular telephone services, telefacsimile communication; transmission of voice and data by electronic computer terminals; telegraph communications services; local and long distance telephone communications services; communications by facsimile; radio paging services; television broadcasting; cable television broadcasting; radio broadcasting; leasing of telephone sets, facsimile and related telecommunications equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |