Drawing for BOUNDLESS PLAYGROUNDS

USPTO serial 76120498

BOUNDLESS PLAYGROUNDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOUNDLESS PLAYGROUNDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hayley Werner

CLAUDINE MEREDITH-GOUJON PAUL WEISS RIFKIND WHARTON & GARRISONLLP1285 AVE OF AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019-6064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Recreational equipment, namely play structures comprised of climbing units, platforms, sand boxes, swingsets, jungle gyms, playhouses, gymnastic apparatus and slides; plush toys and dollsACTIVEDec 2, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jan 27, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2004LSOULATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE
Dec 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 3, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 3, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 5, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 2, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 7, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 30, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 30, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance