USPTO serial 76120538
TONELINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TONELINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana A. Schwind
DANA A SCHWIND MORRIS MANNING & MARTIN LLP3343 PEACHTREE RD STE 1600ATLANTA, GA 30326UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND MANUALS DISTRIBUTED AS A UNIT, FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, ORDER PROCESSING, COORDINATION OF TRANSACTIONS AMONG BUYERS AND SELLERS OF GOODS OR SERVICES, FINANCIAL RECONCILIATION, FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CREATION OF FINANCIAL REPORTS, SALES AND INVENTORY ANALYSIS, AND CAPTURE AND ANALYSIS OF CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR DATA | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES, NAMELY, MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL, AND BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS OVER ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS AND THE TRANSMISSION AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA VIA EXTENSIBLE MARKUP COMPUTER LANGUAGE (XML); TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTING AND NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |