USPTO serial 76127262
RUSSIAN SILICON VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUSSIAN SILICON VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Schneider
ROBERT J SCHNEIDER CHAPMAN AND CUTLER111 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60603-4080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Association services, namely, promoting the interests, goals, and objectives of software developers, hardware developers, industry system integrators, network operators, and businesses, through programs, publications and communications in the field of software application development, design and development implementation, and support of sites and resources on a global computer network; integration of computer systems and networks; computer services, namely, software application development for others and computer consulting in the field of software applications; computer hardware design and development for others; developing turnkey computer systems for others; customized computer research for others featuring searching and retrieving information, sites, and other resources available on a global computer network; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; career management services, namely, career counseling and career guidance information services for individuals; online resume preparation services and resume preparation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |