USPTO serial 76131880
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M. Kent
EVAN M KENT RUSS, AUGUST, KABAT & KENT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 12LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1052UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, magazines featuring material of an adult nature and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communication and/or transmission satellite services; broadcasting services; communication services for radio or television; broadcasting and transmission of television programs and cable television transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, films featuring adult entertainment and drama provided by means of global communications network, cable television, satellite television, digital terrestrial television; production of television programs, namely, drama and film for video | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |