USPTO serial 76131965
RES-CUE PUMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RES-CUE PUMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Linthicum, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Lewis
JAMES L LEWIS LEVY & GRANDINETTI1725 K ST NW STE 1401WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus, namely portable resuscitation pump | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |