USPTO serial 76132201
HEALTH CARE PRIVILEGES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEALTH CARE PRIVILEGES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig L. Mytelka
CRAIG L MYTELKA WILLIAMS MULLEN CLARK & DOBBINS1 OLD OYSTER POINT RD STE 210NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23602-7121UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Medical referrals | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | Personal wellness programs, namely, providing information on alternative medicine, nutritional support supplements, audio tapes, and support literature | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing a web site in the field of health and medical information via a global computer network; providing medical information via telephone in the nature of health care information featuring information on a wide variety of health related topics of general interest to the consuming public available via a travel agent; and health care services, namely, providing emergency medical support, a toll free telephone nurse hot line for counseling, namely, offering advice regarding personal health care issues; maintaining files and records available twenty four hours a day concerning the medical conditions of individuals for use in the event of a medical emergency during travel | ACTIVE | Apr 27, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Benefit Plan, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HEALTH CARE PRIVILEGES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |