Drawing for SUPER SONIC KEY

USPTO serial 76133545

SUPER SONIC KEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPER SONIC KEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Electronic storage of digital signatures, digital certificates encryption/decryption and identification informationACTIVE
042Generation, formation, production, installation, control, transfer, authentication, and registration of digital signatures, digital certificates, encryption/decryption and identification information on voice and data communication terminals, namely, cellular, personal communication services aka PCS, satellite, and wireless local loop telephones, handsets, and communication devices; computers, desktop computers, portable computers, handheld computers, laptop computers, and personal digital assistants aka PDA, workstations, servers, wireless network interface devices, and remote control devices having wireless communication features, namely, automobile, automotive and home security and wireless communication devices and portable controllers, therefore, namely, key fob devices, proximity detectors, and accessories, namely, facsimile/modem cards, radio frequency aka RF and intermediate frequency aka IF transceiver circuit assemblies, and analog and digital signal processing circuit assemblies for wireless communication, and manuals therefore.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 31, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 31, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 7, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 7, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 14, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Dec 14, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 14, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 9, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 31, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 31, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jan 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 9, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 27, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 31, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance