USPTO serial 76133771
QIKCACHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2004
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QIKCACHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.
WEST LEBANON, NH
Other trademarks owned by PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.
PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.
WEST LEBANON, NH
Other trademarks owned by PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.
PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.
WEST LEBANON, NH
Other trademarks owned by PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.
PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD.
Grand Cayman, BWI, KY
Other trademarks owned by PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for use with high performance mass storage device, data transfer, data backup, storage and caching, in all fields | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PLATYPUS TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named QIKCACHE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |