USPTO serial 76134834
TALKING DIRTY LAUNDRY WITH THE QUEEN OF CLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TALKING DIRTY LAUNDRY WITH THE QUEEN OF CLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie J. Mableson
CONNIE J MABLESON LIEBERMAN,. DODGE, GERDING, KOTHE ET ALPHOENIX CORPORATE CTR3003 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1800PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2909Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, MAGAZINES, LOOSE-LEAF BINDERS AND LOOSE LEAF NEWSLETTERS, ALL FEATURING INFORMATION ON CLEANING TOPICS, CLEANING SUGGESTIONS AND CLEANING FORMULAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF LIVE PERSONAL APPEARANCES BY A CLEANING SPECIALIST WHO IS A PUBLISHED AUTHOR, AT PUBLIC EVENTS, RADIO SHOWS AND TELEVISION SHOWS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUEEN AND KING ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by QUEEN AND KING ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TALKING DIRTY LAUNDRY WITH THE QUEEN OF CLEAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |