USPTO serial 76135308
ULTIMATE CHUCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2943118Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2005
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTIMATE CHUCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-74348 Lauffen/Neckar, DE
D-74348 Lauffen/Neckar, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR THE METALWORKING, WOODWORKING AND PLASTICS PROCESSING INDUSTRIES; NAMELY, CLAMPING CHUCKS, MANDRELS, CLAMPING CHUCKS OF METAL FOR WORK PIECES, GRIPPING CHUCKS; ELECTRICALLY, HYDRAULICALLY OR PNEUMATICALLY DRIVEN TRANSLATING, SWIVELING AND LIFTING CHUCKS; ROTATING CHUCKS, METAL CLAMPING DRILL CHUCKS FOR POWER DRILLS, POWERED EXPANSION CHUCKS, POWERED SHRINKAGE CHUCKS; BACK STAY FOR LATHES; CLAMPING CYLINDERS FOR POWER CLAMPING CHUCKS; POWERED EXTENSION CHUCKS, AND PARTS THEREOF | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |