USPTO serial 76135745
THINKLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THINKLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Gallen 9000, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY W LEEDS
HENRY W LEEDS DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL, EDUCATIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIALS FOR COMPUTER EDUCATION AND WEB-BASED TRAINING | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, VIDEO AND DATA VIA A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MOTIVATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL SPEAKERS AND CONDUCTING CLASSES AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND WEB-BASED TRAINING AND COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING SERVICES; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING SPORTING AND CULTURAL ACTIVITIES, NAMELY, LEARNING CIRCLES AND PLAY CLUBS IN THE FIELDS OF ADULT EDUCATION AND CORPORATE TEAM BUILDING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |