USPTO serial 76136007
TRAVELPLAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRAVELPLAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julius Rabinowitz
JULIUS RABINOWITZ HUGHES HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLPONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004-1482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books, brochures and magazines, all in the field of travel | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | transport by ship, vehicle, rail, air, packaging goods for transportation, warehouse storage, travel agencies services, namely, making reservations and booking for transportation and arranging travel tours | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Restaurant services, namely, providing food and drink, providing temporary housing accommodation, hotel services and hotel reservations, services rendered by restaurants and canteens, medical services, travel agency services, namely, making reservations and booking for temporary lodging and tourist houses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |