USPTO serial 76136255
I2I
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I2I?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Engineering and consulting services in the fields of information technology, automation, manufacturing and electronic business, namely, scope development; front-end engineering; project estimation; bid-package development; engineering project management; enterprise resource planning systems; manufacturing plant documentation for operations, maintenance, engineering, service, and training departments; PLC/DCS/HMI specification/development/configuration; P and ID design/development; control narrative definition; detailed electrical instrumentation design; electrical instrument specification, evaluation, and procurement; electrical area classification; high-, medium- and low-voltage power distribution design/implementation; hardwired safety interlock design; software safety interlock design; electrical heat trace design; electrical control cabinet construction; control cabinet design and layout; network design and layout; computer networking and system architecture design and implementation; internet and extranet website drafting, design and development; process simulation/customer acceptance; SQL/custom database design/configuration; report generation; visual basic development; on-site checkout/startup | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 2, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |