USPTO serial 76136394
OPEN FINANCE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPEN FINANCE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, AND RETIREMENT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT TOOLS OVER COMPUTER NETWORKS AND GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; PROVIDING APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER ENVIRONMENTS THAT HOST CUSTOMIZED OR NONCUSTOMIZED FINANCIAL SERVICE CENTERS INCLUDING RETIREMENT, INVESTMENT AND FINANCIAL PLANNING TOOLS AND SOLUTIONS | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 1999 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, web and computer software development and implementation of financial, investment and retirement planning and management tools; hosting web sites for others on a computer server for a global computer network; providing financial, investment and retirement planning and management tools over computer networks and global computer networks; developing application service provider environments that host customized or noncustomized financial service centers including retirement, investment and financial planning tools and solutions | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |