USPTO serial 76136567
JULEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JULEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | AERATED WATER; AERATED FRUIT JUICES; BEER WORT; BEER; BEER-BASED COOLERS; BRUNSWICK ALE; CONCENTRATES USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKS; DE-ALCOHOLIZED WINES; ESSENCES FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF LIQUEURS; ESSENCES FOR THE PREPARATION OF MINERAL WATERS; FRUIT JUICES; FRUIT DRINKS; FRUIT FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS; FRUIT NECTARS; FRUIT PUNCH; FRUIT-BASED SOFT DRINKS FLAVORED WITH TEA; FRUIT-FLAVORED DRINKS; GINGER BEER; GINGER ALE; ISOTONIC DRINKS; LAGER; LEMONADE; MALT BEER; MALT WORT MINERAL WATER; NON-ALCOHOLIC BEER; NON-ALCOHOLIC MALT COOLERS; NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAIL MIXES; NON-ALCOHOLIZED WINES; NON-ALCOHOLIC MALT BEVERAGE; PALE BEER; POP; POWDERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKS; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING SMOOTHIES; SELTZER WATER; SOFT DRINK COLAS; SOFT DRINKS FLAVORED WITH TEA; SOFT DRINKS; SYRUP FOR MAKING LEMONADE; SYRUP FOR MAKING MALT BEVERAGES; SYRUPS FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS; SYRUPS FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS; and SYRUPS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKS; | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |