USPTO serial 76136589
SHORELINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2803949Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2004
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHORELINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CONNIE L ELLERBACH
CONNIE L ELLERBACH FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software and manuals sold as a unit, for the management, administration, and control by others of telecommunications systems, private branch exchange systems or call distribution systems; telecommunication and communications switches, routers and servers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 25, 2000 |
| 037 | Installation for others of computer networks; maintenance for others of computer networks; repair of telecommunications systems; repair of computer networks; repair of communications systems; installation and maintenance for others of hardware for both telecommunications systems and communications systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1999 |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely troubleshooting of problems with telecommunications systems, computer networks and communications systems for others via telephone, email and in person; telecommunications and computer services, namely the supervision and monitoring of telecommunications systems, private branch exchange systems, and call distribution systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shoreline Communications, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Shoreline Communications, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Shoreline Communications, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHORELINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |