USPTO serial 76136676
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
Montreal, Quebec H3B 4W8, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services, namely, transaction services including, namely, commercial, bank or financial transactions, sensitive content, services of analysis and evaluation of consumption profiles for companies, merchants and financial institutions, services of authentication and authorization of transactions; check and credit card processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, providing bi-directional text messaging, electronic mail, electronic data interchange, fixed and wireless communications, radio communications, and multiple-user access to a global computer network, the internet, and internet networks; providing information and directories featuring technical specifications of telecommunications and internet products and services; electronic transmission of computerized documents | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing electronic publications, namely, commercial directories and business databases on the world wide web; research and development in information and telecommunications technology; creating developing, maintaining and programming pages and web sites on a global computer network; technical support services, namely, providing technical assistance for telecommunications and internet products and services via the telephone, e-mail, and in person; designing, installing and updating computer software for the retail sale and wholesale industry; designing, installing and updating computer software allowing access to different computerized database libraries and internet sites | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |