USPTO serial 76137183
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.
IRVINE, CA
Other trademarks owned by UNIVERSITY MEDICAL PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Laval, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Newhall, CA
Valencia, CA
Valencia, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair gels, hair sprays, body moisturizers, body washes, shaving creams, cleansing lotion, face creams, facial lotion, facial masks, facial scrubs, hair cleaning preparations, night cream, non-medicated hair care preparations, skin abrasive preparations for the face, skin clarifiers for the face, skin cleansers for the face, skin cleansing for the face, cream for the face, skin masks for the face, skin moisturizer masks for the face, skin toners for the face | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 10, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |