Drawing for VINYLEX

USPTO serial 76137402

VINYLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VINYLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James D. Halsey, Jr.

JAMES D HALSEY JR STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL DOORS AND WINDOWSABANDONED—
019NON-METAL DOORS AND WINDOWSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 13, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 13, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 9, 200244DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
May 9, 20021.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance