Drawing for SILICA DOORS

USPTO serial 76137403

SILICA DOORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILICA DOORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL DOORSACTIVE
019NON- METAL DOORSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Aug 23, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 1, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 2, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 11, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance