USPTO serial 76137451
FARCYTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FARCYTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Reagents for use in radioactive and fluorometric assays used in scientific research | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Drug discovery system consisting of fluorescent plate readers; namely, a low light imager consisting of camera, camera chamber, focus tower, light-tight outer easing, and telecentric lens, filter wheels and lamps and automated plate delivery device for detection of drugs, and microfiltre plates for scientific research use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 8, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |