USPTO serial 76138012
ASIMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ASIMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HONDA GIKEN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by HONDA GIKEN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
HONDA GIKEN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by HONDA GIKEN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
HONDA GIKEN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by HONDA GIKEN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LABORATORY ROBOTS HAVING HUMAN LIKE MOTION AND MOBILITY AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR NOT FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH PROVIDING MEDICAL CARE OR PATIENT MONITORING IN HOSPITALS OR OTHER PATIENT CARE FACILITIES; ROBOTS HAVING HUMAN LIKE MOTION AND MOBILITY FOR PERSONAL OR HOBBY USES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HONDA GIKEN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by HONDA GIKEN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by HONDA GIKEN KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ASIMO
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 28, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |