Drawing for LOGICASSIST

USPTO serial 76138049

LOGICASSIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOGICASSIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce B Brunda

BRUCE B BRUNDA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISESTE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technical consultation and research in the fields of systems engineering, design engineering, web site development, computer systems, computer networks, computer software and computer hardware; Computer systems and program management support services for others in the nature of troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, electronic mail, in person, and over the global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 2, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 14, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 30, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 18, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 18, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 12, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance