USPTO serial 76138174
INTEGRATED VASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTEGRATED VASCULAR SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Medical Technology Group, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA
INTEGRATED VASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
SUNNYVALE, CA
INTEGRATED VASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
SUNNYVALE, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical and diagnostic instruments for closing wound punctures and percutaneous entry sites, namely introducer sets, sheaths, trocars, obturators, dilators, guide wires, vascular clips, staples, plugs, sutures, closure devices for closing wound punctures and percutaneous entry sites, clip applicators, and instruments for delivering clips and closure devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Medical Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED VASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED VASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named INTEGRATED VASCULAR SYSTEMS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |