USPTO serial 76138516
GRAIN LOOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRAIN LOOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ENMASSE CHAIN CONVEYOR THAT MOVES GRAIN AND GRANULAR PRODUCTS THROUGH ROUND TUBING, TO AND FROM STORAGE CONTAINERS AND GRAIN PROCESSORS SUCH AS SEED AND GRAIN DRYER UNITS, CLEANER UNITS, AND MILLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF MECHANISMS THAT CONVEY VARIOUS AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS BETWEEN STORAGE CONTAINERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |