USPTO serial 76138687
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, EXCLUDING BEER, NAMELY DISTILLED LIQUOR, WINE, WINE COOLERS, PREPARED ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS, AND APERITIFS AND ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY LIQUEURS, HARD CIDER, BRANDY SPIRITS, DISTILLED LIQUORS, DISTILLED SPIRITS, GIN, WINE, WHISKEY, VODKA, RUM, TEQUILA, ANISETTE AGUAMIEL, AGUARDIENTE | ABANDONED | Aug 9, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |