Drawing for SHEEP IN THE BIG CITY

USPTO serial 76138996

SHEEP IN THE BIG CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHEEP IN THE BIG CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for men, women and children, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, jogging suits, trousers, jeans, shorts, tank tops, rainwear, cloth bibs, skirts, blouses, dresses, suspenders, sweaters, jackets, coats, raincoats, snowsuits, ties, robes, hats, caps, sunvisors, belts, scarves, sleepwear, pajamas, lingerie, underwear, boxer shorts, socks, shoes, swimwear, and Halloween and masquerade costumes comprised of body suits and face masksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 12, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 12, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 1, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 1, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance