USPTO serial 76139304
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Innovations -- Successful Salon Services, Inc.
Chatsworth, CA
Other trademarks owned by Innovations -- Successful Salon Services, Inc.
Innovations -- Successful Salon Services, Inc.
Chatsworth, CA
Other trademarks owned by Innovations -- Successful Salon Services, Inc.
Innovations -- Successful Salon Services, Inc.
Chatsworth, CA
Other trademarks owned by Innovations -- Successful Salon Services, Inc.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bath and body products, namely, body lotions, shower gels, bath salts, body and facial scrubs and exfoliants, bath cream, hand cream, body and facial mists, massage and body oils and perfumes, moisturizers and cleaners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 25, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |