Drawing for BUILDING THE NEW LOCAL ECONOMY

USPTO serial 76139751

BUILDING THE NEW LOCAL ECONOMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUILDING THE NEW LOCAL ECONOMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ramon D. Foltz

9870 Partridge TrailKirtland, OH 44094UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PREPARING AND PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS, NAMELY, SELECTED COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS; COMMERCIAL INFORMATION AND DIRECTORY AGENCY, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION ON COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, SERVICES, AND COMPANY INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET AND PRINTED MEDIAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance