USPTO serial 76140247
CULLIGAN GOLD SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CULLIGAN GOLD SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter C. Lando
PETER C LANDO FEDERAL RESERVEWOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Water treatment equipment in the nature of water softening units for domestic, commercial and industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2003 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |