Drawing for X TEND S.T. DUPONT PARIS

USPTO serial 76140405

X TEND S.T. DUPONT PARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X TEND S.T. DUPONT PARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN A. GOLDSMITH

STEPHEN A GOLDSMITH LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Cuff links, tie clips, tie fasteners; money clips, cigarette lighters, cigarette cases and key holders, all of precious metal; watches and clocksACTIVE—
018wallets, purses, business card cases, calling card cases, credit card cases, handbags, travelling bags, attache cases, briefcasesACTIVE—
034Tobacco, cigars, cigarettes, cigarette lighters not of precious metal, cigarette cases not of precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 11, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 2, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 17, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 9, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 9, 2004ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 9, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 200444EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED—
Apr 12, 200444DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Apr 12, 20041.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Apr 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance