USPTO serial 76140405
X TEND S.T. DUPONT PARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X TEND S.T. DUPONT PARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75014 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN A. GOLDSMITH
STEPHEN A GOLDSMITH LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Cuff links, tie clips, tie fasteners; money clips, cigarette lighters, cigarette cases and key holders, all of precious metal; watches and clocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | wallets, purses, business card cases, calling card cases, credit card cases, handbags, travelling bags, attache cases, briefcases | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Tobacco, cigars, cigarettes, cigarette lighters not of precious metal, cigarette cases not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |