USPTO serial 76140583
EHOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EHOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lois R. Fishman
LOIS R FISHMAN NEFF LAW GROUP LLPCALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST TWR STE 65021515 HAWTHORNE BLVDTORRANCE, CA 90503-6501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | "Electronic mail services for hotel guests, hotel employees, conventioneers, travelers at airports and train stations," | ACTIVE | May 5, 2000 |
| 042 | "Computer services, namely, providing multiple-user access to the Internet for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information from private and public locations for the benefit of hotels, hotel guests, travelers and convention attendees; providing electronic hotel concierge services for the benefit of hotels and hotel guests via the Internet; licensing of computer software, including computer telephony software and software permitting access to the Internet, printing functionality, and other interactive information and entertainment services for hotel guests and other travelers," | ACTIVE | May 5, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |