USPTO serial 76140693
ULTRALINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2976549Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRALINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M BERMAN
ROGER W BLAKELY JR BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing web-based enrollment services for health and employee benefits administration; business services, namely, coordination of the delivery of health care, health plan quality evaluation and associated services by a nationwide network of selected health care providers; and information exchange/auction services allowing employers to compare and negotiate health plan quality, performance and price; providing information in the field of human resources via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1989 |
| 036 | providing insurance brokerage services and information for insurance brokers and the general public via a global computer network; insurance consulting and administration services rendered through a global computer network and a regional computer network application for employers, employees, and retired people to obtain information about and to interactively enroll and administer accounts for employees in selected insurance programs; providing insurance services and information including data integration and efficiency solutions for insurance carriers via a global computer network; providing financial information and financial services in the field of financial administration for businesses via a global computer network; administration of employee benefit plans; providing comprehensive benefits administration tools and services for employers and employees via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ULTRALINK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ULTRALINK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ULTRALINK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by iBenefits Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named ULTRALINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |