USPTO serial 76145754
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Portland, OR
Portland, OR
Portland, OR
ELITE CARE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC
PORTLAND, OR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander C Johnson Jr
Alexander C Johnson Jr MARGER JOHNSON & MCCOLLOM PC210 SW Morrison StreetSuite 400PORTLAND, OR 97204| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in monitoring physiological data, physical location and locomotion data, and healthcare facilities for the care of the elderly or disabled | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 11, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |