USPTO serial 76146179
GCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARLA B OAKLEY
CARLA B OAKLEY BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductor chips and chip sets, transmitters, receivers, transceiver, modems, radios, basebands, decoders, codecs (coder/decoder) and combinations thereof, all for enabling wireless telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |