USPTO serial 76148548
INSTANT RTK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2603127Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INSTANT RTK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
SANTA CLARA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
Perry J. Viscounty Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Feature of Global positioning system (GPS) equipment, namely, GPS navigation digital signal receivers, UHF radios, handheld computers, antennas, tripods, and instruction manuals therefor, sold as a unit therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 26, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Magellan Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Magellan Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Magellan Navigation, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ASHTECH, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INSTANT RTK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 28, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |