USPTO serial 76149324
OPSYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPSYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sandy Lane, Oxford OX5 1PF, GB
Sandy Lane, Oxford OX5 1PF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl R. Schwartz
CARL R SCHWARTZ QUARLES & BRADY LLP411 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals for use in the manufacture of electrical visual display devices; luminescent and charge-transporting compounds for use in the electronic displays industry; phosphors, lanthanide compounds and light emitting chemicals for use in electronic displays industry; light emitting dendrimers for use in the electronic displays industry; and light-emitting polymers for use in the electronic displays industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electronic display devices, namely, flat-panel display; organic electroluminescent light-emitting displays; field-emission displays; visual display units, namely, electronic visual display devices used as part of computers televisions, telephones, cellular telephones, personal organizers, palm-top computers, audio and video devices, signs, vehicles, and electronic navigation equipment in the form of global positioning systems; display screens in the form of computer screens, television screens, camcorder viewfinder screens, digital camera viewfinder screens, cellular telephone screens, personal organizer screens, audio device screens and electronic navigation equipment screens in the form of global positioning systems screens; backlights for use with electronic visual display devices; apparatus for displaying visual images, namely, electronic signs, billboards and lighting panels; electrodes for use within electronic display devices; and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |