Drawing for LAMBDA LIGHT

USPTO serial 76149330

LAMBDA LIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAMBDA LIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert D Buyan

ROBERT D BUYAN STOUT UXA BUYAN & MULLINS LLP4 VENTURE STE 300IRVINE, CA 92618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009laser chips and laser modules for Opto-electronic Voice and Data TransmissionACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 1, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 1, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 1, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2003RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED
Mar 8, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 12, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 25, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance