USPTO serial 76149352
GEOVIDEO NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GEOVIDEO NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL I CHAKANSKY
MICHAEL I CHAKANSKY SILLS CUMMIS RADIN TISCHMAN EPSTEIN ET AONE RIVERFRONT PLZNEWARK, NJ 07102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business networking; commercial information agency providing live and prerecorded audiovisual programming; computerized database management; computerized online ordering of stored video information; dissemination of advertising, teleconferencing or infomercials for others via an on-line electronic communications network; licensing of computer software; preparing audio/visual presentations for use in business meetings; provision of networks over a global computer network for product demonstrations and video conferencing and for distribution of live and prerecorded video information | ACTIVE | Jul 11, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |