USPTO serial 76149674
Serial No. 76149674
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76149674?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY P. GOONAN
GREGORY P GOONAN THE AFFINITY LAW GROUP600 W BROADWAY STE 400SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3352UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing access to directory services by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and handheld devices, and via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Personal communications services, namely, local, long distance and international transmission of voice, data, text, facsimile, video, advertising, gaming, and graphics, by means of telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and handheld devices, and via the Internet; Electronic mail and messaging services, namely, recording, storage and subsequent transmission of messages by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and handheld devices, and via the Internet; Computer-aided transmission of messages and images; transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; Paging services; Communications exchange services by telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and handheld devices, and via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |